Comments on: Virginia is for Lovers, England is for Lunatics http://ontapblog.com/2006/01/30/virginia-is-for-lovers-england-is-for-lunatics/ Not Looking Out For You Since 2006 Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:45:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 By: rob http://ontapblog.com/2006/01/30/virginia-is-for-lovers-england-is-for-lunatics/#comment-23 rob Mon, 30 Jan 2006 23:25:17 +0000 http://ontapblog.com/2006/01/30/virginia-is-for-lovers-england-is-for-lunatics/#comment-23 Is this one of those "you can not make up this stuff!" stories? I god I hope this is not true,if it is I bet we will see it in the US within a year! Is this one of those “you can not make up this stuff!” stories? I god I hope this is not true,if it is I bet we will see it in the US within a year!

]]> By: Steve http://ontapblog.com/2006/01/30/virginia-is-for-lovers-england-is-for-lunatics/#comment-21 Steve Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:40:37 +0000 http://ontapblog.com/2006/01/30/virginia-is-for-lovers-england-is-for-lunatics/#comment-21 Dagnabit, try again: http://www.washingtontimes.com/world/20060128-114914-2573r.htm Dagnabit, try again:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/world/20060128-114914-2573r.htm

]]> By: Steve http://ontapblog.com/2006/01/30/virginia-is-for-lovers-england-is-for-lunatics/#comment-20 Steve Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:39:58 +0000 http://ontapblog.com/2006/01/30/virginia-is-for-lovers-england-is-for-lunatics/#comment-20 This version of the article makes the decision sound a bit more reasonable. <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/world/20060128-114914-2573r.htm" rel="nofollow"> This version of the article makes the decision sound a bit more reasonable.

]]>