Must we attack Universal Studios because we don’t like their United 93 web site?
By: Jim Geraghty on April 27, 2006 - 11:22 am

Jim: So I checked out Michelle Malkin’s latest Vent, and I have my first major bone to pick with her.

Michelle has positive things to say about the new film, “United 93″, but she has a major problem with a portion of the film’s web site, entitled, “Why do they hate America?” Malkin laments that the section doesn’t mention bin Laden, that it Catholic-bashes because of its references to the Crusades, it blames Israel for jihad, and an attempt to portray Muslims as “the perpetual victim of Western aggression.” She even compares this essay to statements by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. “Universal Studios has some explaining to do. Blaming the victim is no way to honor the heroes of United flight 93,” she concludes.

Stop. Please.

I tried to make the point with Cam on the show the other day. All Universal Studios has done is answer the prayers of everyone who got tired of neo-Nazis and government conspiracies and “Fahrenheit 9/11″ and “Syriana” and “Flightplan” and made a film that portrays our enemies in the war on terror accurately.

I suspect that if “United 93″ bombs, you will not see another major movie dealing with Islamist terrorism for another ten years. (I know Oliver Stone has his “World Trade Center” coming out this summer; I mean that Hollywood will conclude that the market for “America-is-bad” movies will have been demonstratably profitable, but that there’s no market for “al-Qaeda-is-bad.”)

Do I like the “Why do they hate America” essay? No. But I’m not going to get up in arms about it and attack a studio that’s taken an enormous financial and public relations risk to create a film dealing with issues I’ve been clamoring for for a while. Bashing Universal and comparing their web site to Zarqawi just sends the message that even addressing these issues isn’t worth it.

A little perspective is in order. Let’s dial back our perpetual outrage meters back from 11 once in a while, okay?

Marshall: First, I agree with Jim that Universal has gone out on a limb to make this film, and I want to give them credit where credit is due for that. I think Jim is right that if the film bombs, it’s going to send a powerful message to the other studios. I also agree that Michelle, who I very much like, has gone a little overboard on this one.

Having said that, I’ve also read the essay in question on the website. My reaction: it’s not so much slanted as incomplete. For example, the discussion of “modern times” includes nothing about Israel or the history of Islamic terrorism since World War II. The discussion of ancient history is pretty bland and factual, but again, incomplete. That’s a shame. Universal has an opportunity to educate, and they’ve missed it.


Related Posts
» Oliver Stone’s “World Trade Center” vs. United 93
» Fred Thompson Throws Rotten Tomatoes at the Food Police
» No 2nd Place For Obama
» Bolton Bolts
» On Tap Award: Most Underrated Figure
divider
4 Responses to “Must we attack Universal Studios because we don’t like their United 93 web site?”
  1. 1
    Hal Said:
    April 27, 2006 - 12:18 pm 

    I agree with Jim here on the outrage meter. I’d also add that lowering the snark-o-meter setting would do many bloggers a world of good, too. On Tap’s dials seem in the right place already, of course!

  2. 2
    Danno, an Upbeat American Said:
    April 27, 2006 - 1:52 pm 

    So if we have problems with the liberal message of “Why do they hate America?” then that is an ‘attack’? I don’t think that you would find too many who lost loved ones in the 9/11 ‘attacks’ sharing your view…

    I may not totally agree with Michelle, but she does make many good points, and I too would call upon Universal to explain their question.

    Osama plotted against America while believing that America is a ‘paper tiger’ which he based on the actions of liberals in our government. This movie shows just how wrong he was. ;o)

  3. 3
    Auguste Said:
    April 27, 2006 - 6:12 pm 

    Blogwhore, but you also might want to consider the fact that the website in question appears to be marketing the film to church groups.

  4. 4
    Sean Hackbarth Said:
    April 29, 2006 - 8:38 pm 

    Michelle always has her notch turned to 11. It must be exhausting being outraged at so much all the time. I’m at the point I only read her when she has something newsworthy everyone else is linking to.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment