<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Consistent Inconsistency?</title>
	<link>http://ontapblog.com/2008/02/28/a-consistent-inconsistency/</link>
	<description>Not Looking Out For You Since 2006</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Damon F.</title>
		<link>http://ontapblog.com/2008/02/28/a-consistent-inconsistency/#comment-430193</link>
		<dc:creator>Damon F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ontapblog.com/2008/02/28/a-consistent-inconsistency/#comment-430193</guid>
		<description>"Look, clearly if Obama comes out and says the D.C. Gun Ban is unconstitutional, then that would almost bring up questions about Obama’s support for Chicago’s gun ban (in place since 1983). If he feels that ban is unconstitutional, why didn’t he ever work to get it overturned?"

Because the DC gun ban is mandated at the federal level, it is unconstitutional.  Local government in Chicago has the right to enact gun control law within its jurisdiction.  There is no hypocrisy or inconsistency in Obama's actions here whatsoever.  Next!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Look, clearly if Obama comes out and says the D.C. Gun Ban is unconstitutional, then that would almost bring up questions about Obama’s support for Chicago’s gun ban (in place since 1983). If he feels that ban is unconstitutional, why didn’t he ever work to get it overturned?&#8221;</p>
<p>Because the DC gun ban is mandated at the federal level, it is unconstitutional.  Local government in Chicago has the right to enact gun control law within its jurisdiction.  There is no hypocrisy or inconsistency in Obama&#8217;s actions here whatsoever.  Next!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama - a libertarian on social issues? &#171; Muse Free</title>
		<link>http://ontapblog.com/2008/02/28/a-consistent-inconsistency/#comment-389748</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama - a libertarian on social issues? &#171; Muse Free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 01:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ontapblog.com/2008/02/28/a-consistent-inconsistency/#comment-389748</guid>
		<description>[...] Barack Obama on the other hand has displayed time and again (abortion, healthcare, Patriot Act, mandatory recording of interrogations) that he favours choice and respects freedom. However, I will not go so far as to call him a civil libertarian. Not with this and this and this. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Barack Obama on the other hand has displayed time and again (abortion, healthcare, Patriot Act, mandatory recording of interrogations) that he favours choice and respects freedom. However, I will not go so far as to call him a civil libertarian. Not with this and this and this. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neocon News » Daily Quick Hits 3/1/08</title>
		<link>http://ontapblog.com/2008/02/28/a-consistent-inconsistency/#comment-388767</link>
		<dc:creator>Neocon News » Daily Quick Hits 3/1/08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 08:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ontapblog.com/2008/02/28/a-consistent-inconsistency/#comment-388767</guid>
		<description>[...] A Consistent Inconsistency? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] A Consistent Inconsistency? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricketyclick &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Vote for The Messiah</title>
		<link>http://ontapblog.com/2008/02/28/a-consistent-inconsistency/#comment-387996</link>
		<dc:creator>ricketyclick &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Vote for The Messiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 19:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ontapblog.com/2008/02/28/a-consistent-inconsistency/#comment-387996</guid>
		<description>[...] Senators &#8220;friend of the court&#8221; brief for Heller [PDF], while Obama&#8217;s been very inconsistent, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Senators &#8220;friend of the court&#8221; brief for Heller [PDF], while Obama&#8217;s been very inconsistent, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broadsword</title>
		<link>http://ontapblog.com/2008/02/28/a-consistent-inconsistency/#comment-387549</link>
		<dc:creator>Broadsword</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 11:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ontapblog.com/2008/02/28/a-consistent-inconsistency/#comment-387549</guid>
		<description>Hey1  Are you questioning his patrioti...uh, his sinceri...er, ahem... his hopefulness-ness?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey1  Are you questioning his patrioti&#8230;uh, his sinceri&#8230;er, ahem&#8230; his hopefulness-ness?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://ontapblog.com/2008/02/28/a-consistent-inconsistency/#comment-387198</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 04:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ontapblog.com/2008/02/28/a-consistent-inconsistency/#comment-387198</guid>
		<description>Senator Obama's views are the same as Senator Feinstein's, Shumer, Kennedy, Boxer, Clinton and most of the others who would like to see the 2nd Amendment stricken from the Constitution.  Let him stand on his voting record and the anti gun organizations that he has belonged to over the years.  Now he is trying to disassemble what he has said but his voting record in Illinois and in the Senate of the United States is public record and can't be erased.  Forget about the 2nd Amendment if Senator Obama is elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Obama&#8217;s views are the same as Senator Feinstein&#8217;s, Shumer, Kennedy, Boxer, Clinton and most of the others who would like to see the 2nd Amendment stricken from the Constitution.  Let him stand on his voting record and the anti gun organizations that he has belonged to over the years.  Now he is trying to disassemble what he has said but his voting record in Illinois and in the Senate of the United States is public record and can&#8217;t be erased.  Forget about the 2nd Amendment if Senator Obama is elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonesy</title>
		<link>http://ontapblog.com/2008/02/28/a-consistent-inconsistency/#comment-387175</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonesy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 04:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ontapblog.com/2008/02/28/a-consistent-inconsistency/#comment-387175</guid>
		<description>He's definitely got a problem which could hurt him badly in states like Pennsylvania and Ohio. He's clearly changing for political reasons. My advice would be to say when he was in the Illinois senate he was representing the people of that state, but as president he would be representing the whole country. Thats the best I can come up with. That along with a 'states rights' argument, and saying he's changed his mind about the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s definitely got a problem which could hurt him badly in states like Pennsylvania and Ohio. He&#8217;s clearly changing for political reasons. My advice would be to say when he was in the Illinois senate he was representing the people of that state, but as president he would be representing the whole country. Thats the best I can come up with. That along with a &#8217;states rights&#8217; argument, and saying he&#8217;s changed his mind about the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama Shifting Positions on Gun Ownership? : American Pundit</title>
		<link>http://ontapblog.com/2008/02/28/a-consistent-inconsistency/#comment-387172</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama Shifting Positions on Gun Ownership? : American Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 04:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ontapblog.com/2008/02/28/a-consistent-inconsistency/#comment-387172</guid>
		<description>[...] catch by Cam Edwards, who finds something, er, odd in two statements by the Obama campaign. Here&#8217;s the first [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] catch by Cam Edwards, who finds something, er, odd in two statements by the Obama campaign. Here&#8217;s the first [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://ontapblog.com/2008/02/28/a-consistent-inconsistency/#comment-386837</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ontapblog.com/2008/02/28/a-consistent-inconsistency/#comment-386837</guid>
		<description>Obama is both a liar &#38; anti 2nd Amendment as well as anti gun rights.  He's more anti individual freedom even than Hillary as hard as that is to imagine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is both a liar &amp; anti 2nd Amendment as well as anti gun rights.  He&#8217;s more anti individual freedom even than Hillary as hard as that is to imagine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://ontapblog.com/2008/02/28/a-consistent-inconsistency/#comment-386445</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ontapblog.com/2008/02/28/a-consistent-inconsistency/#comment-386445</guid>
		<description>Obama didn't just fail to oppose Chicago's unconstitutional handgun ban, he actively supported it by joining a small minority of legislators (and a minority even among Democrats) in opposing the law that created a limited self-defense exception to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama didn&#8217;t just fail to oppose Chicago&#8217;s unconstitutional handgun ban, he actively supported it by joining a small minority of legislators (and a minority even among Democrats) in opposing the law that created a limited self-defense exception to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
