This is Rich

A working mother of two special needs children tells the world that Sarah Palin needs to stay at home.

I know that I’m going to be reminded me that I have a nanny, a house manager, and a cleaning woman (who actually shows up every day). But I also have a job that allows me to leave at 2:30. It’s a compromise for me. Because every parent in the world has had to compromise, and it’s fair to judge public figures on the choices they make.

It’s really hard to know where to compromise. Here’s what I was doing when my kid was five months old: I was at home. Hating it. Telling myself that I was not cut out to be at home. I was sort of a columnist and sort of a mom and sort of a psychopath. Because having a five-month-old with special needs is very very hard. Not just learning to take care of the baby, but mentally coping.

Why is no one talking about this? The Republicans should dump Palin. She’s got too much responsibility at home.

Don’t tell me that this is not fair to women. Because you know what? People should have railed against John Edwards running for President when he had two young kids at home and a wife fighting cancer. Fine if she wants him to run for office while she fights the cancer. I get it. But I don’t get how the President of the United States was going to have time to console two school age kids about their mom’s death while leading the country. It’s irresponsible.

I’m guessing Ms. Trunk didn’t write a blog post, or a column, or even utter a word in public about John Edwards and his presidential race until now… after he’s yesterday’s news. And while I’m glad Ms. Trunk is able to compromise and make her life work for her, who is she to presume that Sarah Palin isn’t also making compromises and choices that are best for her family?

Special needs children have (wait for it) special needs. And what area would have more opportunities for specialized and expert care; Juneau, Alaska or Washington, D.C.? Isn’t it possible that a child like Trig can benefit from having a mother as Vice-President? It seems more than possible to me… it seems like a slam-dunk decision.

But even beyond the considerations of providing the best care possible for your special needs child, there is a matter of being called to serve. From what we’ve heard about Sarah Palin, it was the desire to make her world a better place for her family that called her to the PTA, to the City Council, to the Mayor’s office, and to the Capitol in Juneau. If given the opportunity to truly help change the world, don’t you have to answer that call? After all, I doubt Ms. Trunk has complained about Barack Obama leaving his two daughters to spend time on the campaign trail (though we know from Obama himself that Michelle had problems with his time away). Should John Adams have stayed at home rather than travel to Philadelphia? Should Benjamin Franklin have stayed at home, rather than risk the perilous journey across the sea to London? Should Lincoln have remained in Illinois instead of taking his family to Washington?

Ms. Trunk says:

But it’s absurd how extreme these presidential-wanna-be cases are. I don’t want someone in the White House who has kids at home who desperately need them. I don’t want to watch that scenario unfold on national TV. So at some point, it must be okay to speak up. At some point we have to say that we have standards for parenting and we want the community to uphold them.

You’re right Ms. Trunk. We do have standards for parenting, and one of them is instructing our children about what’s really important in this world. You have your part-time job so that you can put food on the table, have an enriching (and rewarding career), and perhaps provide an example to your own children. But you have not been called to serve, except perhaps to serve yourself.

To suggest that parents cannot be politicians is absurd. Service to this country (which is what a political career should be) requires sacrifice; sacrifice many of us aren’t willing to make. It’s the same kind of sacrifice our men and women in uniform possess. Should we bar parents from being firefighters, police officers, or soldiers? After all, many mothers and fathers (including those of special needs children) are currently serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as on the streets of these United States. Are they too “nuts”… or are they heroes?

Keep your part time job, your nanny, and your compromises. Some of us have been inspired this week to sacrifice… not only for our children, but for our country as well.

6 Responses to “This is Rich”

  1. Dana Hall Says:

    AMEN!!!

  2. Susan S Says:

    Oh hold on there, all you idealists who have never had a taste of real life! I cannot help myself respond here - I am a career woman and a mother - 30 yrs in the corporate workplace and I am in absolute agreement with Ms. Trunk. I am all for women’s rights and equal treatment BUT I am also a REALIST.

    I managed a demanding career and raised my two daughters (ages 5 and 8) all alone when my husband died suddenly from a brain anuerysm at age 35.No, my children were not ’special needs’ children but they had the ’special needs’ any child who watches their parent die ends up with. The balancing act was so precarious and stress was so tremendous between my responsibilities to my children and my workplace that I am certain is why I ended up with Multiple Sclerosis. And I didn’t CHOOSE this balancing act. IT CHOSE ME.

    Ms. Palin, on the other hand is tempting fate by throwing caution to the wind. What if her husband drops dead? What if her daughter’s life is endangered during delivery of this baby? Hasn’t she considered these possibilities? And don’t tell me she is the only person that can canvas for ’special needs’ rights….leave that to someone else

    Ms. Palin - you made your choice when you decided to have 5 kids… you don’t even know yet what the score is - this baby is a few months old! Having it ALL doesnt mean having it all at the same time! Raise your children responsibly and then dedicate your life to saving the world. How SMUG!

    All I can say is, thank God Ms. Palin has an ‘in’ with God - because she will need God’s help.

    Irresponsible is an understatement. Do we really need another ‘bring it on’ person in the White House? God help this country.

  3. Liz S. Says:

    I like what Susan said about having it all, but not at the same time. Well put.

    I define sacrifice as staying home with children and GIVING UP professional life. Not the other way around. You can serve in your church, local school, or other places where you may be a role model to your family, first hand and up close and personal. How about serving WITH your family in your community? What I am saying is serving your county is more than Washington DC or Iraq; although it may not be as glamorous or well paid.

    Here is another perspective. I am in my 40s and was raised as a child of a full-time, professional, single, working mother. I realize this is my own experience. However, the experience has scared me for life. The neglect was almost unbearable. Being left to take care and fend for yourself all day only to come home to an empty home is traumatic. Try to find day care for children 13+. They don’t stay babies forever. In the end, most children are left home alone because “they are old enough to take care of themselves”. Are they?

  4. Eric Ogunbase Says:

    What is funny is that this “working mother of two” decided that her job and career was more important than working on her marriage.

    Hello pot, meet kettle!

  5. Alex Says:

    I agree with Ms. Trunk. Palin can in no way balance everything. I just don’t understand how she could expect to care for her youngest child as the vice president. Sure she may be able to get him better care than she could in Alaska, but she won’t be able to give him what he really needs (what all her kids really need) her. Her husband is the only one sacrificing much here. She isn’t sacrificing anything. Palin’s kids are the ones forced to make a sacrifice for her job. Last time I checked, the parents usually sacrifice for their children’s futures. not the other way around. And the fact that her husband has to give up his work to take care of their special needs kid along with their other kids alone doesn’t make much sense either.

  6. Karen Says:

    Palin, at this very moment, is well on her
    way to hopping a number of airplanes to multiple states.

    I recently took a whirlwind trip for a couple of days to but the next state and I am overwhelmed, exhausted and running behind. This, with one grown and one adolescent.

    Five kids at home all the way across the map?

    Recently Palin was criticized for toting the
    kids around, putting them up in hotels at
    someone else’s expense.

    I guess you do have to take them with you,
    or they end up pregnant.

    Great ‘abstinence only’ thing you’ve got
    going on there, Sarah. Did you lack the
    time to drive that home to the kids?
    You have two more daughters to go. Think
    you’ll have the time while playing VP?

Leave a Reply